Tuesday, August 19, 2008

This is the best feminist newspaper on the web

Most of our media is owned or partially owned by wealthy Muslims and their proxies, indirectly and through interlocking boards. Our news information is not selected based on working class and middle class interests but on the interests of wealthy misogynists.

Our politicians and their "advisers" are selected by the same crew. Big money. It operates on both the left and the right --different buzzwords but the same goals. Everything important has been bought and sold and many of us bought the propaganda while money moved behind the veil.

Obama is the sign on the left, McCain is the sign on the right. The media were unmasked during the primaries as were the party operatives and the so called community organizations. All hail Peelosi.

Here, in The City Edition, ezine we have an independent voice for women - a feminist newspaper. Read fast , save your copies, memorize the names of the editors and reporters. When those names change, this source is gone the way of Ms, Emily's List, NARAL, NOW and the Feminist Majority Foundation.

Here's a link to an article published today that discusses the upcoming Democratic National Convention and the circumstances shrouding the August 13th slaying of Bill Gwatney, who headed the Arkansas delegation.

Sen. Clinton won a 44-point victory in Arkansas Feb. 5th, her biggest margin in the primaries.

Because no motive has been established, the story presents an alternative theory of the crime based on the Manchurian Candidate scenario.

Superdelegate Murdered: Has Karl Rove declared open season on Democrats?

Best wishes.--
Rosemary Regello, Editor & Publisher,
The City Edition of San Francisco News, Health, Arts and Marketplace,
239 - 16th Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94118
(415) 762-3600 http://www.thecityedition.com/

Saturday, August 16, 2008

Follow the Money

It is NOT workers who profit from illegal immigration nor is it compassionate to allow it in our country. There is a huge industry posing as progressive thinkers who are paid to make you believe we should not oppose illegal immigratin. Take a look at who profits from "open borders"

Thai slave laborers freed in El Monte become U.S. citizens
Gary Friedman / Los Angeles Times

The women take part in ceremonies in Montebello. They were among 72 workers whose plight in 1995 captured the nation's attention.
By Teresa Watanabe, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
August 14, 2008

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-me-thai14-2008aug14,0,3110172.story?page=2

Maliwan Clinton recalls her first taste of America with a shudder. In this fabled land of the free, she was enslaved behind razor wire and around-the-clock guards in an El Monte sweatshop, where she and more than 70 other Thai laborers were forced to work 18-hour days for what amounted to less than a dollar an hour.

When she was freed, a shocked public learned of slavery in its midst and flooded the Thai laborers with American generosity: Churchgoers offered shelter, community advocates proffered English lessons and job tips, lawyers fought for work permits and legal status for the group.

Exactly 13 years to the day the Thai laborers won their freedom, Clinton's American journey came full circle Wednesday as she acquired U.S. citizenship by taking the oath of allegiance to her new nation.

"I'm an American and this is my home now!" said Clinton, 39, as she waved a miniature American flag at the Montebello ceremony, where more than 3,600 citizens were scheduled to be sworn in by day's end.

Another former slave laborer, Sukanya Chuai Ngan, was also granted citizenship Wednesday. The two women are among dozens of the El Monte workers who have acquired citizenship this year or expect to do so soon.

More than 40 of them had gathered Sunday to celebrate with the Asian Pacific American Legal Center, which successfully fought for a $4-million settlement from manufacturers and retailers for their exploitation and won an uphill battle to gain legal status for the workers.

"Because of their courage, they were able to take what was a horrific experience and emerge from it as victors," said the legal center's Julie Su, their lead attorney for 13 years. "I'm really proud of them, but I'm also proud of America because this nation opened its arms to them and showed its best ideals of freedom and human rights."

The El Monte case drew international attention, blazed new paths in immigration and labor law, led to legislation offering visas for victims of human trafficking and became the subject of an exhibit in the Smithsonian Institution.

The case marked the first time in federal court that garment workers successfully held manufacturers and retailers responsible for the actions of their labor contractor.

It was the shocking nature of modern-day slavery in such a nondescript American neighborhood that so riveted the nation, Su said.

Ultimately, law enforcement officers arrested eight operators of a Chinese Thai garment sweatshop in an early morning raid in August 1995 and freed 72 Thai immigrants, some of whom had been held captive for at least four years.

As they celebrated their journeys to citizenship Sunday with American flags and certificates as "American heroes" from the Asian legal center, the former captives reminisced, often tearfully, over their trials.

Most of them said they came from impoverished farming families and had headed to the metropolis of Bangkok to find sewing jobs. There, they met labor contractors who promised them good jobs in America and monthly pay of $1,000 -- nearly 10 times what some were earning in Thailand.

They were told they would work 8 a.m. to 6 p.m., with weekends off to see the glamorous sights of Los Angeles.

But the reality was vastly different.

Buppha Chaemchoi, 37, said she was shocked to arrive in El Monte and realize that she would sleep crammed in one bedroom on the floor with nine others. The windows had been boarded up, she said, allowing virtually no sunlight. Her captors told her that if she tried to escape, brutal U.S. police would shave her head and stamp her scalp with marks of disgrace, she said.

"It made me worry and want to stay inside and just wait for my three-year contract to end," Chaemchoi said.

Chuai Ngan, 47, who came to the U.S. in 1993, said she also was intimidated with threats that her family would be harmed and their home in Thailand burned down if she attempted to leave.

Not all captives were willing to accept their fate, however.

Win Chuai Ngan, the 51-year-old husband of Sukanya, was the first to escape from El Monte. As one of the few male laborers, he said, he was allowed to go outside to take out the trash and help move sewing machines and other heavy supplies into the complex

One day, he said, he saw a Thai newspaper in the trash, surreptitiously tore out the phone number for a Thai temple and kept it hidden in his pocket. In November 1992, he made his move -- jumping over the fence in the middle of the night. He ran to a taxi stand and asked to be taken to the temple.

"I was so scared the owner would see me and kill me," Win Chuai Ngan said.

He said he told his story to Thai authorities and newspapers in Los Angeles, and gave them an address label for the El Monte complex that he had torn from the newspaper.

But he said he did not report it to U.S. law enforcement officials because he was scared they would deport him.

A few others also escaped, and community advocates eventually helped get the information to authorities. On Aug. 2, a multiagency task force led by the California Department of Industrial Relations raided the complex.

Some of the women were cowed by their captors' earlier descriptions of U.S. police and refused to open the door, which authorities hacked open with an ax. Others said they were overjoyed at their liberation.

"I was so happy," said Clinton, who had been held captive since April 1994. "I thought, 'Oh my God, I'm going home!' "

In the end, most of the workers decided to stay after Su and others successfully fought to win legal status for them. The workers annually celebrate Aug. 13 as their first full day of freedom, since that's when all of them were allowed to leave immigration detention facilities.

Clinton and the Chuai Ngans said that whatever travails they endured here, their American journeys have been well worth taking.

Clinton fell in love and married one of the volunteers who helped her; the couple has two sons.

She works the graveyard shift at Target stocking shelves and aims to attend community college as a steppingstone to a higher-paying job.

Her biggest dream is to sponsor her niece's immigration to the United States -- the daughter of her only sibling, who died in an auto accident.

Chuai Ngan, along with her husband, Win, have started two Thai restaurants and a massage parlor, (so they have now become oppressors of women and are getting rich from it - disgusting) own two North Hollywood homes and four cars, including a Mercedes-Benz.

They earn enough to send money home to relatives and have built a meeting hall, school lunchroom and library in their impoverished rice farming village in northeastern Thailand. The couple also sends school supplies and sports equipment to the village children.

Like countless immigrants before them, the former slave laborers expressed gratitude for the bountiful opportunities in their adopted homeland.

"American people have such big hearts," Clinton said, "and now I'm so proud to say I'm one of them."

latimes.com

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

Thank You feminist porn advocates

Nude Dance at Club by Underage Girl ruled "Artistic" 1st Amendment Expression By Hilary White via the Donna Hughes' Dignity listserve.

HAMBURG, Iowa, August 7, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Nude dancing in strip clubs is "artistic" even when performed by an under age girl, according to an Iowa judge in a ruling issued late last month.

Fremont County Judge Timothy O'Grady called the strip club a "theatre" and agreed with the club owner who argued that the state's indecency law does not apply to "theater, concert hall, art center, museum, or similar establishments."

Hamburg, Iowa, a town of 1,200 just across the Missouri River from Nebraska, has one strip club. After the 17-year-old niece of the local Sherriff, Steven MacDonald, did a nude dance at the club, the owner, Clarence Judy, was charged with violating Iowa's public indecent exposure law.

In a one-day trial on July 17, Judy's lawyer said, "Dance has been considered one of the arts, as is sculpture, painting and anything else like that. What Clarence has is a club where people can come and perform."Fremont County Attorney Margaret Johnson responded that the case was straightforward: an underage girl danced naked at the club, which is illegal.

"Are you saying that minors can't be protected? Can a group of 12-year-olds come down and go in and dance nude and it's OK? I don't think that's what the Legislature had in mind when it made those additional provisions," Johnson said.

The judge ruled, however, that prosecutors failed to prove that the strip club does not qualify as a theatre. "Given the First Amendment implications of a statute that may limit expression, it is not the role of the Court to judge the taste or quality of the art represented at Shotgun Geniez when determining whether or not it is a theater," he said.

The club has a "raised stage with specialized lighting" and "chairs and tables arranged for patrons to observe the stage presentations," as well as "a separate dressing area" for "performers.""

Shotgun Geniez is a facility for presentation of stage performances, and meets the definition of theatre," he said.This recent ruling serves as further evidence of the increasing mainstream acceptance of sexual "dancing."

Indeed, it is no longer unusual to find ads on the internet, in newspapers and magazines in Britain and North America offering lessons in lewd sexual dancing for housewives and young working women as an alternative to fitness classes. Dance studios that offer classes in Tango, wedding and ballroom dancing now routinely offer pole dancing and strip dancing classes.

A dance studio in Las Vegas advertises its pole dancing classes saying, "Strip away your inhibitions to a whole new FIT you! Learn new exotic dance moves on the floor to work up an incredible sweat and top it off with basic pole movements, tricks, and combinations for a work out you'll have fun with."

Monday, August 11, 2008

Beware of Steve Malony and TalkTop65@aol.com

First he sends emails saying they are compiling anti obama blogs - then when you say he can list your blog -he sends emails supporting Mark Penn and trashing Hillary Clinton. In his first emails he says so sweetly

'If you've decided to support Barack H. Obama (and I hope none of you have), just respond by asking me to remove you, and I will. All the best . . . '

steve maloney
ambridge, pa

Stephen R. Maloney
Campaign2008VictoryA


When I did ask him to remove me after an email trashing Hillary this is the response I got:

"Remove yourself. I don't waste time with nutcases."

Stephen R. Maloney
Campaign2008VictoryA
SteveMaloneyGOP

to regain our voice in the Democratic Party

Attn: PUMAS
From: Murphy

This is a huge effort and the project I am asking you to undertake will take some time and a small amount of money for postage. Feel free to use the template letter below, or write your own. Remember the three Puma PAC watchwords: concise, precise, and brief.

Our goal is to force the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee to hold a hearing to decide whether or not Donna Brazile is entitled to her status as Super Delegate.

IMPORTANT!
1. Have your letter notarized. Do NOT sign it before you bring it to
your notary (town hall, bank, insurance agent -- these are all good
places to find a notary).
2. Send your letter "Return Receipt Requested" at the Post Office.

Here is a template for your letter:

DATE

Democratic Nat'l Committee
Credentials Committee
Attn: Alexis Herman
430 S. Capitol St. SE
2nd Floor
Washington, DC 20003

Ms. Herman,

I am writing to demand a meeting of the Rules and Bylaws Committee of the Democratic National Committee to consider the Super Delegate
status of Donna Brazile.

Early in the primary campaign, Ms. Brazile stated that she would resign as a member of the DNC if the Super Delegates decided the outcome of this election. By making such a provocative and divisive statement, in direct contradiction of the stated role of Super Delegates, calls into serious question Ms.Brazile's commitment to our Party and to the democratic process.

Because of her threatening, biased, and divisive actions throughout
this campaign season, Ms. Brazile does NOT deserve the status of Super Delegate to our Convention. She promised on national television she would resign if events during the primaries and caucuses led to a selection of our nominee by Super Delegates. This turn of events has indeed come to pass, and Ms. Brazile should be held to her word. She proclaims loudly and often that she is a person of honor and integrity. Now is her opportunity to show by her actions, for once, that this is true.


Sincerely,

Your full name and address
Democratic Party member

Please send this letter to the RBC as soon as you can.

ANOTHER ACTION
August 11, 2008
TO: Puma PAC Members
FROM: Murphy
Subject: Today's PROWL- Letter one of four

Hello Puma PAC,
This is day four of taking our message to the Super Delegates. We have sent over 150,000 letters to super delegates since last Tuesday -- in just THREE days of organized, collective ACTION. You've all been reading the polls and watching the pundits. The narrative is changing; the cracks WE have known about since April can NO LONGER be denied by our increasingly frantic leadership. We CANNOT stop now.

On June 7th we said, "Thank you Hillary Clinton, we'll take it from here." Well, we mean what we say and we say what we mean. We stood up together on June 7th to continue the fight for REAL Democratic values -- like enfranchisement and equality and fair elections -- when the DNC and the media succeeded at pushing her out of the race with their double standards and sexist bias.

We intend to keep our promise.

Thank you and Good Luck,
Murphy


INSTRUCTIONS FOR EMAIL:
SIGN YOUR NAME - by typing first letter, last name, and the city/state you are writing from above Puma PAC democrat.

Cut and paste these emails into the blind copy line of an email (bcc)

GET THE DELEGATES EMAIL ADDRESS BY SIGNING UP FOR ACTION AT PUMA PAC


SUBJECT:
A FAIR PROCESS IN DENVER

****************************************************************
August 11, 2008
Puma PAC
Reply TO: murphy@pumapac.org

Dear Super Delegate,
I am a Democratic voter and member of Puma PAC, People United Means Action (www.pumapac.org). We represent the more than 18 million American voters who supported Senator Clinton and who reject the selection of Barack Obama as the Democratic nominee.

Barack Obama is simply the weaker of the two final candidates for nomination. He is losing ground to Senator McCain every day. Millions of Democrats vow not to vote for him in November because of his inexperience and unreadiness to lead.

Only Senator Clinton can win back the White House for our Party in November.

PLEASE do your job and support Senator Clinton for nomination in Denver.

The Democratic VOTERS want you to support a real winner and leader. The American PEOPLE want you to. Common Sense wants you to. A commitment to DEMOCRATIC PRINCIPLES wants you to.

PLEASE DO THE RIGHT THING. AMERICAN DEMOCRATS AND VOTERS WILL SUPPORT YOU FOR YOUR COURAGE AND WILLINGNESS TO STAND UP TO PARTY INSIDERS BY REPRESENTING THE VOICE OF THE VOTERS.

Sincerely,


Puma PAC democrat


PumaPac.org
Thank you and good luck.

Sunday, August 10, 2008

Rape Talk

Natasha from WAMI wrote to tell me that the Reclusive Leftist (SEE the Daily Show Bo/MCain monument video, laugh till you pee) has a good post on rape I should read. She mailed me her comment. Except for one sentence it expresses, better than I can, exactly how I feel. So, minus one sentence, I post it here.

BTW, I get nauseated listening to the comfortable western women respond with their cultural relativism crap when some of us try to talk about the slavery of Muslim women. WAMI published photos of the aftermath of the punishment of whipping which is common in Muslim countries for infractions such as hair showing, not being dressed properly, talking to a man, etc. 90 to 100 lashes, over 500 women in the prisons at one time, beatings common in prison and on the streets.

I guess pictures are what it takes to break through the academic garbage taught by our finest well-paid (by taxpayers) academic "feminists" in so called "women's studies" to brainwash the so called "third wave" (which is more like a puddle).

If you don't know what I mean, if you think I am too bitter, go read the "Feminist" Law Professors" blog, look for the writing under "sisters in other nations". They think if they use the word "sister" it will make up for all the cultural relativist crap they post about the slave garments --posts that justify the oppression and slaving of women they have the nerve to call sister. Now this is not "Feministing" or "Femineste" or "Alas a Feminist" or any of the other male identified, left disguised /porn paid as women blogs. This is a blog of academics who presumably have a clear feminist analysis.

They post that men, under the guise of religious "freedom", should be allowed to keep women as slaves, identified by slave clothing in the US and other western nations.

You would think they would be posting about the sharia law, reprinting the codes of countries such as Iran, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, and their constitutions as compared to their legal codes, highlighting discrepancies with a feminist analysis. Doing feminist legal analysis but no.

Instead we get long boring essays on why women who wear garbage bags and don't want to vote should be citizens in France. In fairness, they have some sane posts but there are enough like this to tick me off. Like this:

“Honor killings” overseas and the guy who kills his wife and their children here because she was leaving him have the same effect - they both ... "
Except that you can't organize there, except that it is acceptable under the law there, except that women here, feminists whose work you ignore, have made it unacceptable under the law here. Moral equivalencies = moral relativism. We get drivel from "feminist" law professors.
I expect real feminist scholarship and that means, from legal scholars, a discussion of law and the courts.

The republican women, who we are not allowed to speak kindly of (by the male left) under Condi Rice at the state dept have a project to get more women judges in Afghanistan and female police at the Bamiyan Regional Police Training Center (where women used to live in caves under the Taliban. (see the Office of International Women's Issues website). However, they need pressure right now to publicize what is happening with the legal project, especially when a journalist distributing women's rights material has been sentenced to death. Where are our feminist law professors ?????
Oh, they are justifying Muslim female slave clothing.

Women who write this garbage are not feminist, not sisters, they are the patriarchy's watchdogs, may they rot in hell. They are not even credible academics and they sure as hell should not be teaching women's studies. They are actually teaching MALE IDENTIFIED women's studies which should be clearly labeled as such or labeled, TSOC.

Go see the pictures of a typical sentence for a disobedient Muslim women on WAMI's website.

FROM WAMI ON RAPE
"Conspiracy theories abound about all sorts, but this one is real - rape is being obliterated as a crime, as a word, and as a cause for psychological harm and it’s after-effects are worse almost than the rape. Fuck that shit. We won’t let them do it."

Then if we, you, other, Mean that,

then lets Stop making 'excuses' under Culture

lets Stop making 'excuses' under Religion

lets Stop TOLERATING being sold out by women

who support porn, support misogyny in religion and stop cowering and caving in

to the accusations of racism and imperialism every time we stand UP,

and stop allowing the supporters of misogyny under race, culture, religion, political ideology
to COLONIZE and infiltrate boards and in doing so silencing those revolutionaries who dare take a stand...
or
GET USE TO MORE TOLERANCE OF RAPE.

Women are being SOLD OUT, by leftists [oh HELL YEA], by right wingers, by nationalists, by religious holy warriors, by campaigns, by elites, lawyers, you name it,

we are being sold out.

as Human Beings--either we fight, and I do mean FIGHT, or we lose,
and our daughters lose.

Its either ZERO TOLERANCE or sitting on the fence.

When I see women bearing breasts to protest war yet won't dare even speak up and DEMAND ZERO TOLERANCE TO RELIGIOUS MISOGYNY,
I have to scratch my head and think,
"and they wonder why violence against women is increasing?"

Obama isn't going to save us, Men aren't going to save us, COMPROMISE isn't going to save us

either we stand AS WOMEN FOR WOMEN, ALL WOMEN, RIGHT, LEFT, COMMIES, CHRISTIANS, JEWS,ETC.,
OR WE get used to being the 'chattel' sold, traded, bartered, enslaved, and raped.

Either we Stop the 'you don't speak for us because you're not black or you're not white or you're not liberal and etc etc etc

or we'll wind up, worse off.

Its Now or Never,

FIGHT NOW...OR RESIGN TO THIS,

We DON'T HAVE THE LUXURY OR THE TIME to wait for all women to become lesbian, or all women to become liberal, or all women to forsake marriage...we simply do NOT have the time

there is a spoken war and an unspoken war AGAINST ALL WOMEN in this world--there is right now as we speak FORCES WORKING TO SET UP SHARIA IN THIS COUNTRY, IN EUROPE,

and we talk compromise...

Women its time to wake up--or we are going to wind up Just like the women in the Congo, Just like the women in Columbia, Just like the women in Afghanistan, Just like the women in Iran, Saudi,

and IF we wind up like that---we Can't help them, we can't even help ourselves.

WE'LL MARCH FOR HILARY--BUT WE WON'T MARCH FOR US, FOR WOMEN

WE'LL MARCH AND POSE ON TREES BUTT ASS NAKED [WHILE DEMONIZING OTHER WOMEN WHO ARE SPEAKING UP AGAINST SHARIA, REPUBLICAN OR NOT, DOESN'T MATTER--AT LEAST THEY ARE SPEAKING UP]

but

WE WON'T FIGHT FOR WOMEN

WE'LL FIGHT FOR ANTI-WAR AND PRAISE SUICIDE BOMBERS [AFTER A LIFE OF ABUSE NO WONDER, DUH, DOESN'T TAKE A GENIUS TO FIGURE THAT LEVEL OF MISOGYNY OUT]

BUT DARE WE FIGHT FOR WOMEN AS WOMEN

WE'LL DO IT FOR DE BROTHER, FOR DE NATION, FOR OBAMA, FOR HILARY, FOR MCCAIN, FOR DE UNION, FOR DE POLITICAL PARTY, ...
BUT FOR WOMEN?

for our DAUGHTERS? THEIR DAUGHTERS?

HOW MANY MORE? HOW MANY MORE HAVE TO BLEED BEFORE WE FIGHT?

HOW MANY MORE?

Natasha
Director of WAMI

Friday, August 08, 2008

Aug 26, 1920 Women Won The Right To Vote



Thank you to Alegre's Corner for this wonderful commemoration of the horror and joy of the First Struggle-beatings -arrests - and hunger strikes in prisons leading to forced feedings which were nothing less than torture which equals water boarding. They were called racists too. Nothing much has changed.

I learned this beautiful working women's textile strike song at a Grinell women's conference in 1970's. It was sung at the Lawrence, Mass 1912 Mill strike led by women who sang this as they marched. My webmaster made it into a beautiful page with pictures of my life here.

Obama and Odinga

Blood Brothers or Cousins...?
VERY thorough 17 page article

Reviewing Paula Abeles' "Obama and Odinga"

Rumors always abound, but this well documented article by Paula Abeles is a treasure of truth, and one that everybody should see.(It's a pdf file and takes 2 min to load). It addresses the startling danger to our national security that lies behind the poor judgment and questionable associations that plague Barack Obama wherever he goes.

A brief synopsis follows. The full article with full documentation
and pictures can be found at http://www.realdemocratsusa.org/
It is WELL worth the read, and, more disturbingly still, raises the
question as to why mainstream media has not been more forth-
coming in their coverage despite articles previously published
in the N.Y. Times, London Times and USA Today.

Although the Obama camp, as with so many things, has been
less than forthcoming about the relationship between Barack
Obama and Rail Odinga, the political affiliation between their
fathers, both of the Luo tribe, is established. Contrary to
Barack Obama's assertion that his father was a poor goat herder
from Kenya, he came from a politically privileged, well connected
family where he was closely associated with Rail Odinga's father.

What we do know about Rail Odinga is that he was reportedly set up in the oil business by the al Bakri Group and Muammar Qaddafi and listed in the infamous "Golden Chain" a list of wealthy Saudi financial sponsors. And, after coming to power, he signed an agreement with Islamic extremists in Kenya, in which he agreed to institute Islamic law [with Sharia courts for family law] in exchange for their support, thereby extinguishing the liberties and even the lives of millions of Christian Kenyan women including Obama's sisters, and establishing a safe haven for terrorists in Kenya.

Further, Odinga made opposition to the Kenyan government's crackdown on Al Qaeda supporters a cornerstone of his campaign. After Odinga took office, Al Qaeda cells that blew up embassies in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam were known to have been recruited from mosques near Kenyan beaches.

In what appeared to be a coordinated strategy from the top, a core of whom called themselves, 'The Taliban,', Odinga's Luo supporters engaged in what US envoy Jendayi Frazier called "clear ethnic cleansing" of the Kikuyu opposition, burning Christian women and children alive in churches they had fled to for sanctuary.

Odinga supporters went on a rampage, burning, raping and killing everyone in their path, recreating the horror of the bloody Mau-Mau uprising of the 1950s where thousands were killed and their property taken.

What does this mean to the American people and, indeed the world?

Well, for one thing, Obama has not attempted to distance himself from Odinga, with whom he admitted speaking by phone during the primary. On the contrary, he endorsed and campaigned for Odinga, who is corrupt, ruthless and has financial ties to terrorists.

Further, it is believed that political strategist Dick Morris worked gratis for Odinga's campaign, according to Odinga, at the "request of a mutual friend," purported to be Obama.

In any case, the two campaigns share remarkable similarities, including ties to foreign money, oil and banking interests and intimidation tactics, but perhaps most disturbingly, the use of the campaign phrases, "It is Our Time" by Obama supporters and "It is Our Turn" by Odinga's Luos, who claimed that no matter what, they were going to take power.

Thus far, about 7,000 have lost their lives and 250,000 have been displaced. Human Rights Watch claims that they have evidence that Odinga leaders actively fomented violence that included roaming bands of machete wielding youths.

Senator Obama's actions, decried by both the U.S. State Department and the former Kenyan government, were in direct opposition to the efforts and interests of both the Kenyan Christian population and U.S. National Security.

Senator Obama's efforts on Odinga's behalf, despite his ties to Al Qaeda and Qaddafi, can only be construed as extremely poor judgment, be they the result of a frightening loyalty or merely that of inexperience and naiveté. Either way, it is dangerous and no one can hope to really know what lies behind Obama's true intentions.

Have a blessed and healthy day,
Cristi Adkins, RN Cht

Also seethis article on the BO-OD Connection.

"Obama's Muslim-Outreach Adviser Resigns," by Glenn R. Simpson and Amy Chozick for the Wall Street Journal, August 6, 2008


The Muslim-outreach coordinator to the presidential campaign of Barack Obama has resigned amid questions about his involvement in an Islamic investment fund and various Islamic groups.
Mr. Asbahi said he did not want to distract Obama's campaign.


Chicago lawyer Mazen Asbahi, who was appointed volunteer national coordinator for Muslim American affairs by the Obama campaign on July 26, stepped down Monday after an Internet newsletter wrote about his brief stint on the fund's board, which also included a fundamentalist imam.

"Mr. Asbahi has informed the campaign that he no longer wishes to serve in his volunteer position, and we are in the process of searching for a new national Arab American and Muslim American outreach coordinator," spokesman Ben LaBolt said in a statement.


A corporate lawyer at the firm of Schiff Hardin LLP, Mr. Asbahi tendered his resignation after he and the Obama campaign received emailed inquiries about his background from The Wall Street Journal. He did not respond to the email or a message left at his law office; the campaign released a letter in which Mr. Asbahi said he did not want to be a distraction....


In 2000, Mr. Asbahi briefly served on the board of Allied Assets Advisors Fund, a Delaware-registered trust. Its other board members at the time included Jamal Said, the imam at a fundamentalist-controlled mosque in Illinois.

"I served on that board for only a few weeks before resigning as soon as I became aware of public allegations against another member of the board," Mr. Asbahi said in his resignation letter. "Since concerns have been raised about that brief time, I am stepping down...to avoid distracting from Barack Obama's message of change."

The eight-year-old connection between Mr. Asbahi and Mr. Said was raised last week by the Global Muslim Brotherhood Daily Report, which is published by a Washington think tank and chronicles the activities of the Muslim Brotherhood, a world-wide fundamentalist group based in Egypt.


Other Web sites, some pro-Republican and others critical of fundamentalist Islam, also have reported on the background of Mr. Asbahi. He is a frequent speaker before several groups in the U.S. that scholars have associated with the Muslim Brotherhood.

The Justice Department named Mr. Said an unindicted co-conspirator in the racketeering trial last year of several alleged Hamas fundraisers, which ended in a mistrial. He has also been identified as a leading member of the group in news reports going back to 1993....


Allied Asset Advisors is a subsidiary of the North American Islamic Trust [NAIT]. The trust, which is supported financially by the government of Saudi Arabia, holds title to many mosques in the U.S. and promotes a conservative brand of Islam compatible with the ideology of the Muslim Brotherhood and also akin to the fundamentalist style predominant in Saudi Arabia. Allied executives did not respond to inquiries.


NAIT was listed by the Brotherhood operative Akram, in that same memorandum, as a group allied with the Brotherhood's program.
Posted by Stephen R. Maloney at 12:35 PM 0

Thursday, August 07, 2008

Jenny Still Needs Your Help


Act now so Dallas Zoo elephant can retire to a sanctuary.

After 22 years of being on exhibit at the Dallas Zoo, Jenny is currently the facility’s sole African elephant after Keke, her only companion, passed away in May. Since they are highly intelligent and social animals, the zoo has decided to close the elephant exhibit to prevent her from living alone.

However, rather than allowing Jenny to retire to a large acreage sanctuary setting with other African elephants, they have selected to send her to a safari zoo in Mexico, where 4.9 acres are subdivided into various enclosures. There she will no longer be protected by America’s anti-cruelty and animal welfare laws and her historical fear of motorized vehicles makes it likely that living at Africam Safari would cause frequent anxiety and stress.

Make your voice heard and let Dallas legislators know the zoo officials’ decision is unacceptable. Please support Jenny’s right to a retired peaceful existence and insist she be transferred to The Elephant Sanctuary in Tennessee, where she would have access to hundreds of acres and enjoy the company of others of her same species, instead of the much smaller zoo in Mexico.

THREE WAYS YOU CAN HELP:

1. If you live in the Dallas, Texas area, attend the next Dallas City Council Briefing to support Jenny’s transfer to a sanctuary.

Date: Wednesday, August 6
Time: 9:00 a.m. (be sure to arrive prior to 8:30, as seating is limited)
Place: Dallas City Hall
1500 Marilla Street
6th Floor
Dallas, Texas

Concerns Citizens for Jenny will be distributing “Save Jenny” stickers for supporters to wear.

2. Telephone or e-mail Mayor Leppert to politely to voice your opinion on Jenny. Please do this whether or not you live in Dallas.

Mayor Tom Leppert
Phone: 214-670-4054
E-mail: tom.leppert@dallascityhall.com

3. Write a letter to the editor of the Dallas Morning News to support relocating Jenny to the sanctuary in Tennessee.

Letters From Readers
The Dallas Morning News
Box 655237
Dallas, Texas 75265
Submit your letter online
For more information:

Concerned Citizens for Jenny website

Stop Zoo From Sending Jenny to Amusement Park in Mexico

Action for Jenny, Grieving Elephant at Dallas Zoo

Posted by Jennifer Hayes, Best Friends staff
Photo credit: photo of Jenny provided courtesy of Katie Schlund of Concerned Citizens for Jenny

Tuesday, August 05, 2008

PUMA UPDATE

August 5, 2008

UPDATE from MURPHY

We have reached the top of the roller coaster and are flat-out flying from here to Denver. The actions we take as a group today, tomorrow, and the next few weeks will decide the outcome of the November election -- no matter WHAT happens in Denver.

I wanted to share with you part of an email I received today from one of Puma PAC's most active and effective bloggers. Kat is tireless in her efforts to spread our Voice of the Voters message everywhere she can in the blogosphere and beyond, and she really lifted my spirits today:

"...No worries, ok? Obama is having a terrible week. Just terrible ... McCain now leads by one point, the McCain ads are working, the book "The Obama Nation" came out on the 1st, and then "The Case Against Barack Obama" came out today, on his birthday (after the taxi split with his luggage), and Obama is flip flop--lying on everything from drilling for oil to Nasa monies, and there are all sorts of big stories brewing on No Quarter and elsewhere.

SO, all we have to do is stay focused because we are tight on time.

It's all good anyway, no one would want to attack Puma Pac (and all pumas) if they weren't threatened by their/ our power. You know how many enemies powerful people have? bwaahhhwahhh. It comes with the territory. Screw 'em." So, Everyone -- let's stay focused and active and positive! We have many days between now and August 27th.

Each day is a new day for activism and organizing. Please check the blog daily for updates and new action items.

1. DOCUMENTARY! The Puma PAC documentary "The Audacity of Democracy: The Hillary Flashpoint and the Battle for the Soul of the Democratic Party" is in production, and it is DYNAMITE! After only 2 weeks of filming, the director, Brad Mays, and producer, Lori Starfelt, have hundreds of hours of footage and an inspiring short clip from the developing story. Please take a look at the promotional clip on Youtube and send a link to it to all your friends and family. Here's the link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8t4PKGc2Fw

2. DENVER! Puma PAC and the Just Say No Deal coalition will be in Denver for the entire Convention week. We will be coordinating protest and visibility actions, live-blogging, and live-hosting radio shows from Puma Headquarters in Denver. We are doing everything we can to help Puma members get to Denver. Final bus information will be available later this week.

3. DELEGATES! Puma PAC is continuing its efforts to reach out to Super Delegates and pledged delegates EVERY DAY between now and the final vote at the Convention on the floor in Denver. This is about FAIRNESS and DEMOCRACY.

Hillary Clinton's 18 million Democratic voters and delegates have a RIGHT to have their votes and voices COUNT at our party's convention. We are not going to be satisfied with lip service to democracy or symbolism instead of fair representation.

4. OUTREACH! Sorry, couldn't think of a synonym for Outreach that begins with "D." So, it is vitally important that we keep spreading the Puma PAC message. We are the Voice of the Voters in the Democratic Party and we intend to get our party back.

Please visit the ACTION CENTER and print out 50 flyers or cards to distribute in your neighborhood.

Send your email lists a letter inviting them to join. Tell your friends that there IS an alternative to falling in line -- it's called Puma PAC, and we WILL succeed.

Thank you so much to everyone for ALL you are doing to make our movement viable, strong, and effective. We are making history with each passing day!

Murphy

Thursday, July 31, 2008

Aug 26 1920 women won the right to vote - This Aug 26 2008 be in Denver for Hillary

Listen, I can't afford to go but you can. On the 88th anniversary of women getting the vote, Aug 26th, Hillary will speak at the democratic convention in Denver--everyone that can go, should go.
PUMA JUST WROTE TO TELL ME
There are no tickets to get into the event. You either had to be a volunteer and hope for posting to the Pepsi Center (highly unlikely) or a delegate.
Nancy
Another reason to hate the DNC. While the empty suit is at an outdoor stadium, Hillary is kept where we cannot be with her. I don't believe I will ever vote democrat again.

HOW OBAMA WON THE NOMINATION WHEN HILLARY WON THE VOTE!
Thanks to PUMA for the research

A Short List of Our Lovelies for You to Choose From

Baron Hill! Congressman from Indiana! Call 202-225-5315. ($12,500 from Obama. $2,500 from Clinton. Hillary won Indiana by 2 points and his district by 30 points.)

Carol Shea-Porter! Congresswoman from New Hampshire! Call 202-225-5456. ($11,500 from Obama. $2,500 from Clinton. Hillary won New Hampshire by 2 points and her district by 14 points.)

Jeff Bingaman! OOH — a Senator, from New Mexico! Call 202-224-5521. ($4,200 from Obama. Zero from Clinton. Hillary won New Mexico by 1 point.)

Frank Lautenberg! Wow! Another Senator, from New Jersey! Call 202-224-3224. ($9,00 from Obama. Zero from Clinton. Hillary won New Jersey by 10 points.)

Ron Klein! Congressman from Florida! Call 202-225-3026. ($11,000 from Obama. $2,500 from Clinton. Hillary won Florida by 9 points and his district by 30 points.)

Joe Donnelly! Congressman from Indiana! Call 202-225-3915. ($7,500 from Obama. Zero from Clinton. Hillary won Indiana by 2 points and his district by 2 points.)

Gerald McNerney! Congressman from California! Call 202-225-1947. ($5,000 from Obama. Zero from Clinton. Hillary won California by 9 points and his district by 12 points.)

Jason Altmire! Congressman from Pennsylvania! Call 202-225-2565. ($10,000 from Obama. Zero from Clinton. Hillary won Pennsylvania by 12 points and his district by 60 points.)

Niki Tsongas! Newly sworn-in Congresswoman from Massachusetts Call 202-225-3411. ($5,000 from Obama. Zero from Clinton. Hillary won Massachusetts by 16 points and her district by 30 points.)

Dennis Cardoza! A feisty Congressman from California! Call 202-225-6131. ($4,000 from Obama. Zero from Clinton. Hillary won California by 9 points and his district by 60 points.)

Gabriella Giffords! Congresswoman from Arizona! Call 202-225-2542. ($9,000 from Obama. Zero from Clinton. Hillary won Arizona by 9 points and her district by 3 points.)

Jim Costa! Congressman from California! Call 202-225-3341. ($4,000 from Obama. Zero from Clinton. Hillary won California by 9 points and his district by 35 points.)

Zack Space! Congressman from Ohio! Call 202-225-6265. ($7,500 from Obama. Zero from Clinton. Hillary won Ohio by 10 points and his district by 47 points.)

Charlie Wilson! Congressman from Ohio! Call 202-225-5705. ($7,000 from Obama. Zero from Clinton. Hillary won Ohio by 10 points and his district by 38 points.)

Jay Rockefeller! Another Senator! And he’s RICH too! Bonus! (from West Virginia, sorry — but West Virginia IS one of the 57 states, so you’ll need some lovin’ from Appalachia come November). Call 202-224-7665. ($5,000 from Obama. Zero from Clinton. Hillary won West Virginia by 40 points.)

Wednesday, July 30, 2008

Polarizing Viewpoints on Sex Trafficking

by Janice Shaw Crouse

The crime of human trafficking is now the world’s second most prevalent crime (behind drug trafficking). According to Kevin Bales, Disposable People, there are more sex slaves today than there were slaves in the 19th century. Sex trafficking is, in many respects, worse than drug trafficking because drugs can be sold only once, but those who are trafficked can be sold repeatedly, often twenty to thirty times a day. Further, the criminal networks who offer children and women as sexual commodities, and those who purchase their sexual services are highly unlikely to get caught. If they do, they are even less likely to be prosecuted. Sex trafficking is one of the few crimes where the victim is the one who is arrested and prosecuted.

President George W. Bush made it a priority to end human slavery by establishing the Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons (TIP) in the United States State Department, encouraging the passage of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA), and using his bully pulpit to urge the eradication of “modern-day slavery.” As a result, the United States is the world leader in addressing the scourge that ensnares hundreds of thousands of vulnerable children and women.

The original TVPA’s emphasis on ending the demand for prostituted women and children put the focus where it belonged, on the criminals and johns who were bringing in over $10 billion a year by using human beings as commodities. In other words, the legislation focused on punishing pimps, not arresting prostitutes. Each reauthorization of the TVPA tightened gaps in victim protection, perpetrator prosecution and domestic and international efforts to abolish the slave trade. This year’s TVPA is historic legislation that would greatly strengthen anti-trafficking efforts; it passed the U.S. House of Representatives by a vote of 405-2.

Sadly, when the bill went to the Senate, several factions (including, amazingly, the Department of Justice) succeeded in gutting the House bill. Ultimately, the Senate version of the legislation (S. 3061) contains major problems:

The definition of prostitution: The Senate bill defines prostitution as a form of “labor or services,” making the relationship between a pimp or trafficker and a prostituted person normative, just another employer and employee. Prostitution, then, is a legitimate career option for girls and women. The Department of Justice even uses the term “labor or services” in their flawed Model Law. The House bill maintains the critical distinction established in the TVPA of 2000 between commercial sex acts and the performance of “labor or services.” Supporters of legalized prostitution favor the “labor or services” definition. Abolitionists view prostitution and sex trafficking as destructive and enslaving problems ­ a human rights issue for women.

Attitudes toward prostituted women: Considering that the average age of entry into prostitution in the United States is 12-14 years old, the House bill and abolitionists recognize that requiring proof of force, fraud or coercion in cases involving prostituted adults is a very high burden of proof and the burden falls on the victim. Prostituted minors are de facto trafficking victims, but victims not identified until after age 18 are often so scared or traumatized that they will not testify against their pimps and traffickers. The House bill and abolitionists consider the proof of force, fraud and coercion to be a means of enhancing punishment of the traffickers but not a baseline for prosecution. Further, they argue that the burden of proof must be removed from victims of trafficking and placed on the pimps and traffickers. The Department of Justice (DOJ) opposes this, and the Senate bill does not have this provision.

Exploiting illegal aliens: The House bill makes trafficking in illegal aliens a per se crime by eliminating the requirement that prosecutors prove the trafficker caused the illegal alien to come to the United States. This closes a loophole that allows traffickers to say they were not the person who brought the victim into the country. The Senate bill excludes this provision and the DOJ opposed the House provision.

Sex tourism: The House bill includes a maximum sentence of 30 years for promoting sex tourism with minors and holds sex tour operators accountable for perpetuating the demand for sex tourism. The Senate bill does not include the enhanced sentence for sex tourism involving minors, and it bars prosecutions of sex tour operators if the tours promote commercial sex acts that are legal in the destination country. The DOJ opposes the House provision.

Sex trafficking of minors: The House bill codifies the decisions of six circuit courts that authorize the conviction of sex traffickers without proof that the trafficker knew the victim was a minor. The Senate bill uses the “reckless disregard” standard for proof, which is higher and still allows a trafficker to claim they did not know the victim was a minor. The DOJ opposes the House provision.

Coordination of anti-trafficking programs and worldwide efforts: The House bill charges the TIP office with the responsibility for coordinating anti-trafficking programs and evaluating various nations’ efforts at eradicating human trafficking. The central point of accountability is vital to the success of anti-trafficking efforts. The Senate bill leaves the TIP office with little authority for continuing their strong record of anti-trafficking programs.

America’s leadership role in combating human trafficking is threatened by the Senate version of the TVPA. Those Senators who care about the scourge of sex trafficking will see that the provisions of the House bill prevail so that vulnerable girls and women are protected from the predators who exploit any legislative and legal loophole to get rich through modern-day slavery.

About The Author
Janice Shaw Crouse, Ph.D., Senior Fellow at the Beverly LaHaye Institute, the think tank for Concerned Women for America, is a recognized authority on domestic issues, the United Nations, cultural and women’s concerns.

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

SAGE Founder needs Love and Support

I would like it if you would pass an update along to Dignity List Subscribers. Much appreciated. Norma


Dear all, I have thought endlessly about what to say concerning what is going on with me, how I am doing, and how I miss the work. In the end I am speakless. I was diagnosed with terminal pancreatic cancer in April. I was alone when I was told. I remember my body convulsing. The Dr. left without telling the nurses the news he just conveyed to me, so they were shocked when they found me hysterical in my little cubicle. Since then I had a 7 hour surgery, mainly to see if there was anything missed or if anything else could be done. There isn't.

I have been offered chemo, "to buy time," but mostly been encouraged to choose a shorter quality of life over, the effects of the chemo. Many of you come in at this point. You have given me the will and resources to fight.I have gone to one of the best alternative health clinics that was founded during the beginning of the breast cancer "movement," 25 or so yrs ago. They recommend chemo, supplements, and we are exploring clinical trials, meanwhile I am also seeing a Vietnamese Dr. The upside is that my first CAT Scan since surgery was very good. Many of the side effects, as well as the size of the tumor, have either resolved or in the case of the tumor, it has grown very, very little. I am extremely tired and lonely, but with your help and caring, I am fighting.

I am now meeting long term survivors-today is my first meeting and they are offering many alternatives as well as much needed support, such as the best nutritionists and Stanford Doctors for 2nd opinions. I have lost 80 lbs. and can't seem to get enough calories or the right ones to stay healthy and keep every little ounce.

Your thoughts, love, and support means more than you know. It is lifesaving. Thank you, thank you, thank you. I will stay in touch. Keep up the great work.
Love and hugs, Norma

******

Please support Norma's medical fund.

As most of you know, Norma is the founder and Executive Director of SAGE, one of the first survivor-led service centers for trafficked and prostituted women. For almost two decades she has been a leader and an innovator in the work to fight human trafficking. Now she needs our help. We hope you will take the time to visit this site and make a contribution to a Friends of Norma fund.

Sincerely,

Donna Hughes
Laura Lederer
Lisa Thompson
Marissa Ugarte

(For more about Norma's work, see also here: )

Sunday, July 27, 2008

Letter to Hillary

Mark at Democrat in Exile answered Hillary's call to tell her what is important to her through Hillpack and inspired me to do the same. I used his words in part of this letter with quotes. I hope you will also write her.

Dear Honorable Senator Clinton:

Thank you for asking about what matters to us. I used to care most about democrat party primary reform to include the following:
(a)caucuses are eliminated,
(b)republican crossover voting is eliminated,
(c)the (super) delegate system is eliminated and every vote counts,
(d)the convention delegates vote for the candidate who won the popular vote in their state by a majority of the votes counted excluding caucuses.

But then I read this on the behind the scene work of the corporate democrats whom we all have hated as they lose us Roe and Equal Pay WHEN THEY HAVE BEEN THE MAJORITY. They think they can frighten us into voting for their empty suits while the Republicans continue to use their ambition to trick them into self defeating actions.

The Repubs also use the left's sexism, reverse racism and identity politics against them. Please read this article about Brazile and Pelosi:

"You believe in party unity, but there can be no unity when the party ignores the popular vote, disenfranchises voters, and opts for centralized power over the will of the people. Unity cannot take place in an atmosphere of disrespect for democracy, democratic processes, and the will of the people.

So, what matters to me is that you stand up for democracy and honor the will of the people and make sure that you are on the nomination ballot at the Democratic Convention.

In my opinion, this country needs a viable third party, and the women of America, along with a bunch of men could create a viable, long-term, third party. True coalition building does not happen in two-party systems. You have the potential to be the first modern-day independent president."

I want a third party that truly stands for the working class, protects the jobs of CITIZENS, creates equal rights for women globally (through the IVAWA) and at home and protects the environment through the proposals you made in the primaries.

Get ready to lead this new third party as soon as the elections are over because Mccain is going to win.

Sincerely,

aka Greenconsciousness on the web

If you want to understand Obama's rise to power, you have to read this article

I believe The City Edition is the best e-zine for feminist on the web - the political analysis is insightful, intelligent and in most instances, although not all, steps outside of both the patriarchal and leftist filters which is unusual.

This excerpt is here to convince you to read this article in The City Edition.com ,The Donna Brazile - Karl Rove Connection BY ROSEMARY REGELLO. The article starts with detailing the business connections between Donna Brazile and Carl Rove. Then goes on as follows
...
Hard as it must have been to top that inspirational title, Brazile easily managed with her piece “Tapping the Obama Factor”. The Chicago politician had just been elevated to the U.S. Senate, but instead of offering an introduction to him, she mostly dwelled on her own life story - rising up from poverty in Louisiana, listening to her grandmother recite scripture, etc. etc. Eventually, the essay worked its way back to the stated topic.
"This is a new moment to identify and recruit better messengers," she wrote. "Perhaps it's time to tap into the ‘Obama’ factor: Scour statehouses for young,
energetic, inspiring, and emerging leaders with the ability to connect the head and heart. Too many of the old Democratic guard have stayed in Washington, D.C., too long to fully recognize how most Americans live their lives."

It was a novel way to spin the Illinois election. Obama did score a landslide victory that year, but it had little to do with his age, energy level or the obsolete nature of the Democratic Party establishment. His campaign manager David Axelrod ran the classic Rovian smear campaign, first accusing Obama’s top primary contender, Blair Hull, of sexual impropriety. After disgracing that fellow out of contention, Axelrod used the same device against the G.O.P. primary winner, Jack Ryan.

Of course, this is where things get interesting. House Speaker Dennis Hastert decided he must stick his oar into the battle, calling on Ryan to end his senate bid. The candidate dutifully bowed out, and in his stead, the Illinois Republican Party fielded an unknown, African American bible-thumper from Maryland, Alan Keyes. Clearly, the G.O.P. wanted Obama to win that election. No other explanation can account for the party punting away a senate seat to a (supposedly) liberal Democrat who'd (supposedly) spoken out vehemently against the Iraq War in 2002.

A Hollywood script writer couldn't have come up with this storyline. Within a year of arriving in Washington, Brazile’s rising star – the product of a globe-trotting Kansas woman and a philandering tribal leader in Kenya - had launched his presidential exploratory committee. The Internet fundraising team of Howard Dean signed on for the ride. So, too, did some of Wall Street’s biggest investment banks, corporate law firms, and energy giants. (And we all know what a great record on affirmative action these outfits have.)

By the end of 2007, Obama would post a record-breaking haul of $100 million in campaign contributions. And all while he was still "introducing himself", as Brazile and other analysts put it, to the American public.

Who exactly brought the banks and oil companies to the table still remains to be ferreted out, but it wasn't Dean or Brazile, or even the man who placed Obama on the speaker's list at the 2004 Democratic Convention, John Kerry. It's more likely that Karl Rove huddled with top Bush fundraisers to set that gravy train in motion. Among the candidate's money bundlers were George Kaiser and Robert Cavnar, both oil industry executives. Other Bush campaign pioneers joined the bandwagon soon afterward.

Now Brazile was impressed. Judging from another one of her My Day installments, this one penned in 2005 after Hurricane Katrina, she a woman who had been born again:
“While my family was hurting, when they were on the edge feeling left to fend for themselves, the last thing I wanted to do was whine. I got into the groove quickly and contacted Ken Melhman, Chairman of the Republican National Committee and an old friend, Karl Rove, Deputy Chief of Staff for the White House.”
...
One can only speculate on Brazile’s motives in streaming out that hallucination. As she would mention in the Washington Times article two years later, her “old friend” of four years had hit the ground running with the start of the 2008 election cycle, appearing on talk shows to bash frontrunner Hillary Clinton.

Behind the scenes, G.O.P. rank and file activists were organizing crossover voting drives to knock Clinton out of the race before November. In the red states, they could easily outnumber Democrats at the caucuses, enriching Obama’s delegate count and allowing him to boast later “I’ve won more states.”

To recruit additional foot troops for this effort, New Hampshire G.O.P. leader Stephen DaMaura started the Facebook website “Stop Hillary Clinton (One Million Strong AGAINST Hillary).”

On the Democratic side, it became Brazile's job to smooth over Obama’s path to the nomination. That required manipulating the primary calendar. Picking up on the diversity argument of Eleanor Holmes and the D.C. coalition, she pressed for an earlybird South Carolina primary and a Nevada caucus to augment the Iowa and New Hampshire dates.

While the advantages of South Carolina were obvious, by necessity the second contest required a less obvious, more covert action plan to avoid any accusations of stacking the deck. Although the Clinton camp didn’t realize it at the time, a caucus in Nevada (like a caucus anywhere) would naturally benefit Obama, since her base of blue-collar, older and non-English-speaking supporters would not be driving across town to attend some meeting run by disorganized volunteers.

On the other hand, motivated Republicans could be counted on to show up, especially if the G.O.P. candidates could be persuaded not to campaign in the state. (They didn’t.)

Nevertheless, the reason for adding more earlybird contests in the first place centered on ethic diversity, so selling the DNC (and the public) on Nevada required some tweaking of those caucus parameters. That's why arrangements were made to allow the state’s casino workforce of some 60,000 predominantly Latino workers to attend caucus sites set up just for them.

But wouldn’t this huge Hispanic voting block put Clinton over the top in Nevada? Not necessarily. It turns out that the union representing casino employees, S.E.I.U., would be backing Obama, just as they supported Dean in his presidential bid. So those voters could now be added to the Obama column.

Thus, with caucuses scheduled in Iowa and Nevada, a primary in South Carolina with its near majority African American demographic, and the New Hampshire Republican brass on the job in that state, the chance of Clinton heading into Super Tuesday at cruising altitude had spectacularly diminished.

``Including two more states will not only be good for our country, it will be good for our party and good for our nominee," Brazile told the Los Angeles Times in August 2006.

Sounding an early portent of doom, the South Carolina delegate on the DNC rules and bylaws committee said in the same article, ``If you campaign in a state that is outside the rules, then you're not entitled to delegates from that state."

A year later, that scenario unfolded like a bad dream for the DNC. Over the objections of Florida’s state Democratic Party, a Republican-controlled legislature moved its primary to January 29, 2008, one week before the official February 5th cusp adopted by both the Republican National Committee and the DNC.

On August 25, 2007. the DNC rules committee met to adjudicate this unspeakable crime. State party chair Karen Thurman testified at the meeting, walking the committee through the chronology of her long and fruitless battle to overturn the date switch. The Republicans had attached it as a rider to another bill, one authorizing the replacement of electronic paperless voting equipment with more traditional optical scanners. Unable to defeat the rider on a partyline vote, the Democrats begrudgingly approved the larger measure.

Anyone who has watched the re-broadcast of those DNC proceedings on CSPAN can’t help but be dumbfounded by the discussion that followed Thurman's presentation. A slam-dunk case for a rule waiver turned into a shameless bout of piling on, as committee member Brazile and several others accused the state party of not trying hard enough to change the date. (One also noticed from the broadcast the unusually high number of African Americans on the 30-member committee, as opposed to near invisible representation for other minorities.)

When asked by Brazile why she hadn't made any plans to hold a caucus in place of the primary, Thurman balked. The logistics and $8 million price tag, she said, were beyond comprehension, given that Florida boasts 4 million Democratic voters.

"I understand how states crave to be first,” Brazile blustered in a Washington Post interview the next day, ignoring the entirety of Thurman's testimony. “I understand that they're envious of the role that Iowa and New Hampshire have traditionally played, The truth is, we had a process . . . We're going to back these rules."

Later, the head of the DNC Voting Rights Institute ...."
...
"Seeds of Doubt"

With the votes of the country's fourth and eighth largest states thus consigned to the junk heap, Brazile turned to other pursuits as the primary season commenced. Hired as a paid election analyst for CNN, she carried on a double life - one as an official DNC spokesperson, the other as an unofficial campaigner for Barack Obama. In February, when best-guess estimates gave Clinton the support of two-thirds of the superdelegates, she declared, "If 795 of my colleagues decide this election, I will quit the Democratic Party."

If party leaders were as worried about negative fallout and damage control then as they claimed to be a month later, they might have reeled in their contract employee at this point for a heart-to-heart chat. That didn't happen. Brazile just reloaded her pistol and repeated her empty threat to all who would listen. On another occasion, she accused former President Bill Clinton of being a racist. It was inexcusable, she said, that during a speech Clinton referred to Obama as a "kid" and suggested his presidential bid amounted to little more than a "fairy tale".

"And I will tell you," Brazile bristled with emotion, "as an African American I find his words and his tone to be very depressing."

To be sure, Clinton said Obama's evolving position on the Iraq War was a fairy tale, not his candidacy. As for alluding to his youth, Brazile and other cheerleaders for the Illinois senator had been doing it themselves for the past four years. It was a classic example of the Mark Twain quip that a lie can travel halfway around the world before the truth has put its shoes on. Only CNN's presence in the equation gave the adage literal meaning. Surely, the DNC would intervene now that Brazile had insulted a former Democratic president on national television. But nothing.

Notwithstanding the 24/7 character assassination, Clinton persevered, scoring big wins in the Texas, Rhode Island and Ohio on March 4th. On March 5th, Brazile accused her of engaging in a “negative” campaign designed to "destroy" her adversary.

“Despite Obama's impressive victories in February, Clinton's comeback is based on sowing political seeds of doubt,” the uncommitted superdelegate informed the Associated Press that day, “If these attacks are contrasts based on policy differences, there is no need to stop the race or halt the debate. But, if this is more division, more diversion from the issues and more of the same politics of personal destruction, chairman Dean and other should be on standby."

In response to the call to arms, Dean petitioned Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi to intervene in the protracted race, while Senators Dodd, Richardson and Leahy made the rounds of the news shows, demanding that Clinton end her candidacy for the good of the party.
...

There is much more. Read it and weep.

Saturday, July 26, 2008

Honor Murders Unveiled

I know a second wave feminist whose books I love as several of them have expressed what I needed to know as if they were unlocking my feelings into words. She is a heroine of the movement starting with her book "Women and Madness" in '72 through my favorite, "Women's Inhumanity to Women" and the last "The Death of Feminism"(which is about western feminist's refusal to organize and fight the slave status of women under the Islamic theocracies).

Phyllis Chesler sent this note out to the blogosphere and I hope you get a change to watch TV tonight or tomorrow.

------------------------------------

This weekend, on both Saturday and Sunday evenings at 8pm, EST, Fox-TV will be airing a one hour documentary about honor murders in America. They interviewed me (Phyllis Chesler) at length and you may see my face and my words on camera.

FOX was the only national media outlet that really covered the honor murder of Sarah and Amina Said in Dallas Texas early this year. Kudos to them for their interest in this subject. The crew told me that I was the only domestic violence expert willing to say that honor murders have something to do with….Islam and with Muslims.

The Fox team was utterly amazing: Friendly, professional, exceedingly well prepared. About six or seven serious men arrived with lights, cameras, and computers and they turned my home into a studio-quality locale. I was interviewed by the very beautiful and brainy Lauren Greene but as I now understand it, the program will also be hosted by Megan Kelly. Let me thank Justin Laffer and Byron Garoufalis for providing excellent backup.

I would welcome your views of the program and the subject right here at my blog.

http://pajamasmedia.com/phyllischesler/

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

The Fight to Abolish Human Trafficking Within the United States

See WI proposed Trafficking legislation here.

By Paul M. Weyrich
Jul 23, 2008
Without doubt the Federal appointee who was most effective dealing with sex-trafficking was former Representative John R. Miller (R-WA). President George W. Bush has sought to end sex slavery within the United States and provide international leadership on the issue. Miller was appointed Director of the Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons for the U.S. State Department and became an Ambassador-at-large on the issue of modern slavery. Miller elevated the fight to a high priority in the Bush Administration.

The Fight to Abolish Human Trafficking Within the United States

Recently, Miller wrote an op-ed in THE NEW YORK TIMES which suggested that the effort to oppose sex slavery has met opposition in the Department of Justice (DOJ). Miller also made a presentation to a group with which I am involved. Upon hearing Miller’s presentation I realized that the situation is worse than he described in THE NEW YORK TIMES.

After nurturing the 21st-Century abolitionist movement from 2002 to 2006, Miller believed that President Bush supported him despite objection to his efforts from numerous Ambassadors who did not want their host countries criticized. Miller stated that the President made it clear that his work was important. While he did not win every battle, he prevailed, often thanks to White House support.

One could imagine Miller’s surprise when he learned that DOJ initiated a campaign to oppose a new Congressional bill which would strengthen the Federal Government’s anti-trafficking efforts. In a 13-page letter, DOJ blasted nearly every aspect of the proposed legislation. In its annual report which rates how well countries are combating sex slavery, DOJ does not want to consider whether governments put traffickers in jail, nor does it want the Departments of Homeland Security and Health and Human Services to streamline their efforts to help the victims of sex-trafficking acquire visas and assistance. DOJ does not want to pool data with the Departments of State, Homeland Security and Health and Human Services on sex-trafficking and to devise prevention strategies.

DOJ opposes the creation of Presidential awards for groups leading the struggle against this modern-day slavery. It is against a citizens’ task force to develop a pamphlet for victims. It does not want the State Department to give the telephone numbers of American anti-trafficking organizations to visa applicants at American Consulates worldwide.

Miller believes the vehement opposition by DOJ to this proposed legislation goes far beyond the usual turf battle which usually rears its ugly head in Washington, D.C.

Miller states that DOJ opposes changes which would expand its own authority to combat trafficking.

For example: Should they prosecute American tourists who create the demand for sex-trafficking in foreign countries?

Should Congress provide increased penalties for Americans who sexually abuse children abroad?

Should American jurisdiction extend to Americans who traffic human beings aboard?

Should the Attorney General include information in his annual report on his department’s efforts to enforce anti-trafficking laws against federal contractors and employees?

No, it should not do any of these.

Miller believes this letter is the product of the mostly male DOJ staff working with the Erotic Service Providers Union and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).

He does not believe the President saw or approved the 13-page letter. In the House of Representatives there is a Caucus on Human Trafficking, co-chaired by Representatives Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) and Debbie Price (R-OH). They have been trying to coordinate a meeting with the President but have been unsuccessful.

Regardless of one’s opinion of President Bush, it is impossible to dismiss his sincerity and determination on such issues. I am willing to wager that this letter went to Capitol Hill without his approval. There is time for President Bush to reverse this injustice.

Paul M. Weyrich is Chairman and CEO of the Free Congress Foundation.

Waukesha WI BEWARE

For an analysis of WI oppressive laws disalloing suits by rape victims-go here. See also: Wisconsin SNAP and National SNAP

Leafleting focuses on former United Church of Christ, Methodist minister
By Tom Heinen
Tuesday, Jul 22 2008, 03:18 PM


Members of a victims' advocacy group distributed fliers over the weekend at First United Methodist Church of Waukesha to call attention to the fact that a minister who served as the church's pastor in the mid-1980s was convicted and sentenced last week for sexually assaulting a 17-year-old boy in 1987 while pastor of First United Methodist Church of Rice Lake. He has not been accused in Waukesha.

The Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests(SNAP)wanted to point out, among other things, that child sexual crimes are "not just a Catholic problem" as the group continues to seek support for a Wisconsin Assembly bill that would require all religious denominations to provide the identities and case summaries of clergy, lay teachers, and employees who had sexually assaulted children but were not reported to the police.

The minister, Angel R. Toro, is noteworthy for another reason. After leaving Wisconsin in about 1989, he was granted ministerial standing in the United Church of Christ in 1997 and rose to national leadership positions in that denomination while serving as pastor of Chapel on the Hill in Seminole, near St. Petersburg, Fla. Acclaimed for increasing attendance there from about 30 people to 500 people, Toro served on the denomination's 90-member executive council, was on the team that implemented the "God is still speaking" national identity campaign in 2004 and is a past president of the Local Church Ministries Board, one of the denomination's four national ministry boards.

Toro was placed on a leave of absence from the Florida church in late January of 2007 and resigned both his ministerial standing in the denomination and his position of pastor at the church in March of that year.

After pleading guilty to four counts of fourth-degree sexual assault, Toro, 57, was sentenced last week to two nine-month jail sentences for two of the counts and two three-year probation terms for the others.

-------------------------------
Clergy-abuse prosecution limits clarified
Court rules against priest who left Wisconsin
Associated Press a